Nutrient Comparison: Baked Potato Flesh VS Cooked Taro per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh versus 100 g of Cooked Taro to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh vs Cooked Taro:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 2.7 times more Vitamin B3, 1.7 times more Vitamin B5 and 2.6 times more Vitamin C than Cooked Taro.
- While 100 g of Cooked Taro no Salt contain 1.3 times more Vitamin B2, 2.1 times more Vitamin B9 and 73.3 times more Vitamin E than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- Both Baked Potato Flesh and Cooked Taro provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B6 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2 and Vitamin E
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Cooked Taro no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Baked Potato Flesh vs Cooked Taro:
- 100 g of Cooked Taro no Salt contain 2.1 times more Iron, 2.8 times more Manganese and 1.5 times more Phosphorus than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- Both Baked Potato Flesh and Cooked Taro contain similar levels of Copper, Magnesium, Potassium and Zinc per 100 grams.
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Cooked Taro no Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 3.5 times more Sugars and 3.8 times more Protein than Cooked Taro.
- While 100 g of Cooked Taro no Salt contain 1.5 times more Energy, 1.6 times more Carbohydrate and 3.4 times more Fiber than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro provide inadequate amounts of Protein
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Cooked Taro no Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.