Nutrient Comparison: Baked Potato Flesh VS Taro per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh versus 100 g of Taro to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh vs Taro:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 2.3 times more Vitamin B3, 1.8 times more Vitamin B5 and 2.8 times more Vitamin C than Taro.
- While 100 g of Raw Taro contain 2.4 times more Vitamin B9 and 59.5 times more Vitamin E than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- Both Baked Potato Flesh and Taro provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B6 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Raw Taro have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Baked Potato Flesh vs Taro:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 1.3 times more Copper and 1.3 times more Zinc than Taro.
- While 100 g of Raw Taro contain 8.6 times more Calcium, 1.6 times more Iron, 1.3 times more Magnesium, 2.4 times more Manganese, 1.7 times more Phosphorus and 1.5 times more Potassium than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Raw Taro lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 4.3 times more Sugars and 1.3 times more Protein than Taro.
- While 100 g of Raw Taro contain 2.7 times more Fiber than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- Both Baked Potato Flesh and Taro offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 100 grams.
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Raw Taro provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.