Nutrient Comparison: Microwaved Potato Flesh VS Cassava per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Microwaved Potato Flesh versus 100 g of Cassava to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Microwaved Potato Flesh vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Microwaved Potato Flesh have 1.5 times more Vitamin B1, 1.9 times more Vitamin B3, 5.6 times more Vitamin B5 and 3.6 times more Vitamin B6 than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 1.9 times more Vitamin B2, 2.3 times more Vitamin B9 and 1.4 times more Vitamin C than Microwaved Potato, Flesh Only no Salt.
- 100 grams of Microwaved Potato Flesh have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
- Both Microwaved Potato, Flesh Only no Salt as well as Raw Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Microwaved Potato Flesh vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Microwaved Potato Flesh have 2.4 times more Copper, 1.5 times more Iron, 4 times more Phosphorus and 1.5 times more Potassium than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 2.3 times more Manganese than Microwaved Potato, Flesh Only no Salt.
- Both Microwaved Potato Flesh and Cassava contain similar levels of Magnesium and Zinc per 100 grams.
- Both Microwaved Potato, Flesh Only no Salt as well as Raw Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Microwaved Potato Flesh have 1.5 times more Protein than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 1.6 times more Energy and 1.6 times more Carbohydrate than Microwaved Potato, Flesh Only no Salt.
- Both Microwaved Potato Flesh and Cassava offer comparable quantities of Fiber per 100 grams.
- Both Microwaved Potato, Flesh Only no Salt as well as Raw Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.