Nutrient Comparison: Cooked Taro VS Tomato Paste per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cooked Taro versus 100 g of Tomato Paste to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cooked Taro vs Tomato Paste:
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro have 1.8 times more Vitamin B1, 2.4 times more Vitamin B5, 1.5 times more Vitamin B6 and 1.6 times more Vitamin B9 than Tomato Paste.
- While 100 g of Canned Tomato Paste contain 19 times more Vitamin A, 5.5 times more Vitamin B2, 6 times more Vitamin B3, 4.4 times more Vitamin C, 1.5 times more Vitamin E and 9.5 times more Vitamin K than Cooked Taro no Salt.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin K
- Both Cooked Taro no Salt as well as Canned Tomato Paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cooked Taro vs Tomato Paste:
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro have 1.5 times more Manganese than Tomato Paste.
- While 100 g of Canned Tomato Paste contain 2 times more Calcium, 1.8 times more Copper, 4.1 times more Iron, 1.4 times more Magnesium, 2.1 times more Potassium, 5.9 times more Selenium, 3.9 times more Sodium and 2.3 times more Zinc than Cooked Taro no Salt.
- Both Cooked Taro and Tomato Paste contain similar levels of Phosphorus per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro have 1.7 times more Energy, 1.8 times more Carbohydrate and 1.2 times more Fiber than Tomato Paste.
- While 100 g of Canned Tomato Paste contain 24.9 times more Sugars and 8.3 times more Protein than Cooked Taro no Salt.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro provide inadequate amounts of Protein
- Both Cooked Taro no Salt as well as Canned Tomato Paste provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.