Nutrient Comparison: Winged Bean Tuber VS Cassava per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Winged Bean Tuber versus 100 g of Cassava to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Winged Bean Tuber vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Winged Bean Tuber have 4.4 times more Vitamin B1, 3.1 times more Vitamin B2 and 1.9 times more Vitamin B3 than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 1.4 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Raw Winged Bean Tuber.
- Both Winged Bean Tuber and Cassava provide similar amounts of Vitamin B5 and Vitamin B6 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Winged Bean Tuber have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- Both Raw Winged Bean Tuber as well as Raw Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Winged Bean Tuber vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Winged Bean Tuber have 1.9 times more Calcium, 13.9 times more Copper, 7.4 times more Iron, 1.4 times more Manganese, 1.7 times more Phosphorus, 2.2 times more Potassium, 2.5 times more Sodium and 4.1 times more Zinc than Cassava.
- Both Winged Bean Tuber and Cassava contain similar levels of Magnesium per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Raw Winged Bean Tuber as well as Raw Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Winged Bean Tuber have 8.5 times more Protein than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 1.4 times more Carbohydrate than Raw Winged Bean Tuber.
- Both Winged Bean Tuber and Cassava offer comparable quantities of Energy per 100 grams.
- Both Raw Winged Bean Tuber as well as Raw Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.