Nutrient Comparison: Beet Greens VS Cassava per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Beet Greens versus 100 g of Cassava to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Beet Greens vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Beet Greens have 316 times more Vitamin A, 4.6 times more Vitamin B2, 2.3 times more Vitamin B5, 1.2 times more Vitamin B6, 1.5 times more Vitamin C, 7.9 times more Vitamin E and 210.5 times more Vitamin K than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 2.1 times more Vitamin B3 and 1.8 times more Vitamin B9 than Raw Beet Greens.
- Both Beet Greens and Cassava provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin E and Vitamin K
- Both Raw Beet Greens as well as Raw Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Beet Greens vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Beet Greens have 7.3 times more Calcium, 1.9 times more Copper, 9.5 times more Iron, 3.3 times more Magnesium, 1.5 times more Phosphorus, 2.8 times more Potassium, 16.1 times more Sodium and 1.5 times more Water than Cassava.
- Both Beet Greens and Cassava contain similar levels of Manganese and Zinc per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Raw Beet Greens as well as Raw Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Beet Greens have 2.1 times more Fiber and 1.6 times more Protein than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 7.3 times more Energy, 8.8 times more Carbohydrate and 3.4 times more Sugars than Raw Beet Greens.
- 100 grams of Beet Greens provide inadequate amounts of Energy
- Both Raw Beet Greens as well as Raw Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.