Nutrient Comparison: Cassava VS Garland Chrysanthemum per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cassava versus 100 g of Garland Chrysanthemum to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cassava vs Garland Chrysanthemum:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 1.6 times more Vitamin B3 and 14.7 times more Vitamin C than Garland Chrysanthemum.
- While 100 g of Raw Garland Chrysanthemum contain 116 times more Vitamin A, 1.5 times more Vitamin B1, 3 times more Vitamin B2, 2.1 times more Vitamin B5, 2 times more Vitamin B6, 6.6 times more Vitamin B9 and 184.2 times more Vitamin K than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin K
- 100 grams of Garland Chrysanthemum have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Raw Garland Chrysanthemum have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cassava vs Garland Chrysanthemum:
- 100 g of Raw Garland Chrysanthemum contain 7.3 times more Calcium, 1.4 times more Copper, 8.5 times more Iron, 1.5 times more Magnesium, 2.5 times more Manganese, 2 times more Phosphorus, 2.1 times more Potassium, 8.4 times more Sodium, 2.1 times more Zinc and 1.5 times more Water than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 6.7 times more Energy and 12.6 times more Carbohydrate than Garland Chrysanthemum.
- While 100 g of Raw Garland Chrysanthemum contain 1.7 times more Fiber and 2.5 times more Protein than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Garland Chrysanthemum provide inadequate amounts of Energy