Nutrient Comparison: Cassava VS Cooked Tree Fern per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cassava versus 100 g of Cooked Tree Fern to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cassava vs Cooked Tree Fern:
- 100 grams of Cassava have more Vitamin B1, 1.7 times more Vitamin B5 and 1.8 times more Vitamin B9 than Cooked Tree Fern.
- While 100 g of Cooked Tree Fern no Salt contain 6.3 times more Vitamin B2, 4.1 times more Vitamin B3, 2 times more Vitamin B6 and 1.5 times more Vitamin C than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cooked Tree Fern have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B5
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Cooked Tree Fern no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cassava vs Cooked Tree Fern:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 1.7 times more Iron, 4.2 times more Magnesium, 6.8 times more Phosphorus and 54.2 times more Potassium than Cooked Tree Fern.
- While 100 g of Cooked Tree Fern no Salt contain 2 times more Copper, 1.4 times more Manganese and 1.5 times more Water than Raw Cassava.
- Both Cassava and Cooked Tree Fern contain similar levels of Zinc per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cooked Tree Fern lack sufficient amounts of Magnesium, Phosphorus and Potassium
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Cooked Tree Fern no Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 4 times more Energy, 3.5 times more Carbohydrate and 4.7 times more Protein than Cooked Tree Fern.
- While 100 g of Cooked Tree Fern no Salt contain 2.1 times more Fiber than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cooked Tree Fern provide inadequate amounts of Energy and Protein
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Cooked Tree Fern no Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.