Nutrient Comparison: Epazote VS Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Epazote versus 100 g of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Epazote vs Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin:
- 100 grams of Epazote have 17.4 times more Vitamin B2 and 21.5 times more Vitamin B9 than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
- While 100 g of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 3.8 times more Vitamin B1, 2.3 times more Vitamin B3, 2.9 times more Vitamin B5, 2 times more Vitamin B6 and 3.6 times more Vitamin C than Raw Epazote.
- 100 grams of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
- Both Raw Epazote as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Epazote vs Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin:
- 100 grams of Epazote have 55 times more Calcium, 6.1 times more Iron, 5.5 times more Magnesium, 22.4 times more Manganese, 2 times more Phosphorus, 1.7 times more Potassium, 10.8 times more Sodium and 3.7 times more Zinc than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
- Both Epazote and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin contain similar levels of Copper and Water per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Raw Epazote as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Epazote have 2.1 times more Fiber than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
- While 100 g of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 2.7 times more Energy, 2.7 times more Carbohydrate and 5.7 times more Protein than Raw Epazote.
- 100 grams of Epazote provide inadequate amounts of Energy and Protein