Nutrient Comparison: Butternut Winter Squash VS Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Butternut Winter Squash versus 100 g of Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Butternut Winter Squash vs Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies:
- 100 grams of Butternut Winter Squash have 26.6 times more Vitamin A, 2.9 times more Vitamin B1, 1.9 times more Vitamin B3, 2.7 times more Vitamin B5, 1.5 times more Vitamin B6, 3 times more Vitamin B9 and 3.4 times more Vitamin C than Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies.
- Both Raw Butternut Winter Squash as well as Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Butternut Winter Squash vs Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies:
- 100 grams of Butternut Winter Squash have 2.4 times more Calcium, 2.7 times more Iron, 3.1 times more Magnesium, 1.5 times more Manganese, 2.4 times more Phosphorus and 3.3 times more Potassium than Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies.
- While 100 g of Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies contain 1.3 times more Copper and 100.3 times more Sodium than Raw Butternut Winter Squash.
- Both Butternut Winter Squash and Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies contain similar levels of Water per 100 grams.
- Both Raw Butternut Winter Squash as well as Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies lack sufficient amounts of Selenium and Zinc in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Butternut Winter Squash have 3.2 times more Carbohydrate than Canned Tomatoes with Green Chilies.
- Both Raw Butternut Winter Squash as well as Canned Red Ripe Tomatoes with Green Chilies provide inadequate amounts of Energy, Omega 3, Omega 6 and Protein in 100 grams.