Nutrient Comparison: Baked Potato Flesh VS Succotash per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh versus 100 g of Succotash to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh vs Succotash:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 4.3 times more Vitamin B5 and 2.3 times more Vitamin B6 than Succotash.
- While 100 g of Raw Succotash contain 2 times more Vitamin B1, 3.9 times more Vitamin B2 and 4.4 times more Vitamin B9 than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- Both Baked Potato Flesh and Succotash provide similar amounts of Vitamin B3 and Vitamin C per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Raw Succotash have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Baked Potato Flesh vs Succotash:
- 100 g of Raw Succotash contain 5.2 times more Iron, 1.9 times more Magnesium, 4.3 times more Manganese, 2.3 times more Phosphorus and 2.1 times more Zinc than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- Both Baked Potato Flesh and Succotash contain similar levels of Copper and Potassium per 100 grams.
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Raw Succotash lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 g of Raw Succotash contain 7.6 times more Omega 3, 12.9 times more Omega 6, 2.5 times more Fiber and 2.6 times more Protein than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- Both Baked Potato Flesh and Succotash offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6