Nutrient Comparison: Boiled Frozen Butternut Winter Squash VS Succotash per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Boiled Frozen Butternut Winter Squash versus 100 g of Succotash to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Boiled Frozen Butternut Winter Squash vs Succotash:
- 100 grams of Boiled Frozen Butternut Winter Squash have 11.1 times more Vitamin A and 1.2 times more Vitamin B5 than Succotash.
- While 100 g of Raw Succotash contain 4.2 times more Vitamin B1, 2.1 times more Vitamin B2, 3.4 times more Vitamin B3, 1.9 times more Vitamin B6, 2.5 times more Vitamin B9 and 4.3 times more Vitamin C than Boiled Frozen Butternut Winter Squash no Salt.
- 100 grams of Succotash have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A
- Both Boiled Frozen Butternut Winter Squash no Salt as well as Raw Succotash have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Boiled Frozen Butternut Winter Squash vs Succotash:
- 100 grams of Boiled Frozen Butternut Winter Squash have 1.2 times more Water than Succotash.
- While 100 g of Raw Succotash contain 5.2 times more Copper, 3.2 times more Iron, 5.3 times more Magnesium, 4 times more Manganese, 8.1 times more Phosphorus, 2.8 times more Potassium and 5.1 times more Zinc than Boiled Frozen Butternut Winter Squash no Salt.
- 100 grams of Boiled Frozen Butternut Winter Squash lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
- Both Boiled Frozen Butternut Winter Squash no Salt as well as Raw Succotash lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 g of Raw Succotash contain 2.5 times more Energy, 4.2 times more Omega 3, 37.5 times more Omega 6, 1.9 times more Carbohydrate and 4.1 times more Protein than Boiled Frozen Butternut Winter Squash no Salt.
- 100 grams of Boiled Frozen Butternut Winter Squash provide inadequate amounts of Energy, Omega 3 and Omega 6