Nutrient Comparison: Succotash VS Hubbard Winter Squash per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Succotash versus 100 g of Hubbard Winter Squash to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Succotash vs Hubbard Winter Squash:
- 100 grams of Succotash have 3 times more Vitamin B1, 2.1 times more Vitamin B2, 3.2 times more Vitamin B3, 2.5 times more Vitamin B9 and 1.4 times more Vitamin C than Hubbard Winter Squash.
- While 100 g of Raw Hubbard Winter Squash contain 4.5 times more Vitamin A and 3.1 times more Vitamin B5 than Raw Succotash.
- Both Succotash and Hubbard Winter Squash provide similar amounts of Vitamin B6 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Succotash have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A
- Both Raw Succotash as well as Raw Hubbard Winter Squash have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Succotash vs Hubbard Winter Squash:
- 100 grams of Succotash have 2.9 times more Copper, 4.6 times more Iron, 2.5 times more Magnesium, 3.8 times more Manganese, 5.4 times more Phosphorus and 4.7 times more Zinc than Hubbard Winter Squash.
- Both Succotash and Hubbard Winter Squash contain similar levels of Potassium per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Hubbard Winter Squash lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
- Both Raw Succotash as well as Raw Hubbard Winter Squash lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Succotash have 2.5 times more Energy, 5.2 times more Omega 6, 2.3 times more Carbohydrate and 2.5 times more Protein than Hubbard Winter Squash.
- While 100 g of Raw Hubbard Winter Squash contain 1.7 times more Omega 3 than Raw Succotash.
- Both Succotash and Hubbard Winter Squash offer comparable quantities of Fiber per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Hubbard Winter Squash provide inadequate amounts of Energy and Omega 6