Nutrient Comparison: Succotash VS Baked Potato Flesh per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Succotash versus 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Succotash vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of Succotash have 2 times more Vitamin B1, 3.9 times more Vitamin B2 and 4.4 times more Vitamin B9 than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 4.3 times more Vitamin B5 and 2.3 times more Vitamin B6 than Raw Succotash.
- Both Succotash and Baked Potato Flesh provide similar amounts of Vitamin B3 and Vitamin C per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
- Both Raw Succotash as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Succotash vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of Succotash have 5.2 times more Iron, 1.9 times more Magnesium, 4.3 times more Manganese, 2.3 times more Phosphorus and 2.1 times more Zinc than Baked Potato Flesh.
- Both Succotash and Baked Potato Flesh contain similar levels of Copper and Potassium per 100 grams.
- Both Raw Succotash as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Succotash have 7.6 times more Omega 3, 12.9 times more Omega 6, 2.5 times more Fiber and 2.6 times more Protein than Baked Potato Flesh.
- Both Succotash and Baked Potato Flesh offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6