Nutrient Comparison: Cooked Taro VS Taro per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cooked Taro versus 100 g of Taro to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cooked Taro vs Taro:
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro have 1.2 times more Vitamin E than Taro.
- Both Cooked Taro and Taro provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Taro have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
- Both Cooked Taro no Salt as well as Raw Taro have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cooked Taro vs Taro:
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro have 1.3 times more Iron than Taro.
- While 100 g of Raw Taro contain 2.4 times more Calcium than Cooked Taro no Salt.
- Both Cooked Taro and Taro contain similar levels of Copper, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium and Zinc per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Cooked Taro no Salt as well as Raw Taro lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro have 1.3 times more Energy, 1.3 times more Carbohydrate and 1.2 times more Fiber than Taro.
- While 100 g of Raw Taro contain 2.9 times more Protein than Cooked Taro no Salt.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro provide inadequate amounts of Protein
- Both Cooked Taro no Salt as well as Raw Taro provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.