Nutrient Comparison: Succotash VS Mashed Hubbard Winter Squash per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Succotash versus 100 g of Mashed Hubbard Winter Squash to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Succotash vs Mashed Hubbard Winter Squash:
- 100 grams of Succotash have 5 times more Vitamin B1, 2.9 times more Vitamin B2, 4.8 times more Vitamin B3, 1.3 times more Vitamin B6, 4 times more Vitamin B9 and 2.3 times more Vitamin C than Mashed Hubbard Winter Squash.
- While 100 g of Boiled and Mashed Hubbard Winter Squash contain 13.3 times more Vitamin A and 2.3 times more Vitamin B5 than Raw Succotash.
- 100 grams of Succotash have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A
- Both Raw Succotash as well as Boiled and Mashed Hubbard Winter Squash have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Succotash vs Mashed Hubbard Winter Squash:
- 100 grams of Succotash have 4 times more Copper, 6.5 times more Iron, 3.7 times more Magnesium, 5.5 times more Manganese, 8.1 times more Phosphorus, 1.7 times more Potassium and 6.1 times more Zinc than Mashed Hubbard Winter Squash.
- 100 grams of Mashed Hubbard Winter Squash lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
- Both Raw Succotash as well as Boiled and Mashed Hubbard Winter Squash lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Succotash have 3.3 times more Energy, 7.1 times more Omega 6, 3 times more Carbohydrate, 1.3 times more Fiber and 3.4 times more Protein than Mashed Hubbard Winter Squash.
- While 100 g of Boiled and Mashed Hubbard Winter Squash contain 1.3 times more Omega 3 than Raw Succotash.
- 100 grams of Mashed Hubbard Winter Squash provide inadequate amounts of Energy and Omega 6